MYTH TWO - YOU MUST HAVE A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
The parents make application for a Social Security number (SSN) for the newborn baby or one is applied for shortly thereafter. This is an adhesion contract which further obligates the new man or woman to the government.
The SSN is the “Consideration” for the international banking cartel to collateralize our ability to produce goods, services and acquire wealth into the indefinite future as “a derivative” to float the public debt.
MYTH BUSTED!
...About Social Security: “When you pay social security taxes, you are in no way making provision for your
own retirement. You are paying the pensions of those who are already retired. Once you understand this, you see that whether you will get the benefits you are counting on when you retire depends on whether Congress will levy enough taxes, borrow enough, or print enough money... “
W. Allen Wallis, former Chairman of the 1975 Advisory Council on Social Security, May 27, 1976
“There is no prospect that today’s younger workers will receive all the Social Security and Medicare benefits currently promised them.” - Dorcas Hardy, former Social Security Commissioner and author of “Social Insecurity”, quoted in the December 1995 Reader’s Digest.
. , _
“All we have to do now is to inform the public that the payment of social security taxes is voluntary and watch the mass exodus.” Walter E. Williams, John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics at George Mason University in Fairfax, VA, January 24, 1996.
The above quotes courtesy of Joseph Farah, World Net Daily
There is no law which says anyone must apply for a Social Security number (SSN). It is entirely voluntary and, contrary to public opinion, employers cannot deny employment to anyone who does not have a SSN nor can any other services be denied BY ANYONE for lack of a SSN. Not to say it will not happen but if it does it is illegal and can be sued upon.
THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 Title 5 of United States, Code Annotated 552 (a) is known as The Privacy Act of
1974. Based on the Privacy Act, and 88 Stat. 1896, Sec. 7 (a) (1), “It is against the law to require a common numerical identifier such as a social security or other number for any purpose when the individual does not wish to disclose one, they must still receive the right, benefit or privilege afforded by law as others would receive by disclosing a
common numerical identifier.” Courts have ruled in part:
“Right of privacy is a personal right designed to protect persons from unwanted
disclosure of personal information...” I Financial Corporation v. Local 743, D.C., Ill, (1981), 515 F. Supp. 942.
The District Court in Delaware held that The Privacy Act: “was enacted for the purpose of curtailing the expanding use of social security numbers...and to eliminate the threat to individual privacy and confidentiality of information posed by
common numerical identifiers.” Doyle v. Wilson, D.C ., Del. L (1982), 529 F. Supp. 1343.
Should any person, business or government agency decide to deny an individual any right, benefit or privilege when they refuse to reveal a social security number, or other common numerical identifier that man or woman can file summary suit in US District Court, and if successful, are assured a minimum of $1,000.00 plus attorney fees:
(A) actual damages sustained by the individual as a result of the refusal or failure, but in no case shall a person entitled to recovery receive less than the sum of $1,000.00; and
(B) the costs of the action together with reasonable attorney fees as determined by the court.”
Courts have determined that only the following agencies are permitted access to your social security account number:
1. The Department of Social Services, assistance. (D.S.H.S. for public assistance.) 2. The IRS (For tax purposes). Limited to voluntary use only by the people.
The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is a private collection agency for the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)
1974. Based on the Privacy Act, and 88 Stat. 1896, Sec. 7 (a) (1), “It is against the law to require a common numerical identifier such as a social security or other number for any purpose when the individual does not wish to disclose one, they must still receive the right, benefit or privilege afforded by law as others would receive by disclosing a
common numerical identifier.” Courts have ruled in part:
“Right of privacy is a personal right designed to protect persons from unwanted
disclosure of personal information...” I Financial Corporation v. Local 743, D.C., Ill, (1981), 515 F. Supp. 942.
The District Court in Delaware held that The Privacy Act: “was enacted for the purpose of curtailing the expanding use of social security numbers...and to eliminate the threat to individual privacy and confidentiality of information posed by
common numerical identifiers.” Doyle v. Wilson, D.C ., Del. L (1982), 529 F. Supp. 1343.
Should any person, business or government agency decide to deny an individual any right, benefit or privilege when they refuse to reveal a social security number, or other common numerical identifier that man or woman can file summary suit in US District Court, and if successful, are assured a minimum of $1,000.00 plus attorney fees:
(A) actual damages sustained by the individual as a result of the refusal or failure, but in no case shall a person entitled to recovery receive less than the sum of $1,000.00; and
(B) the costs of the action together with reasonable attorney fees as determined by the court.”
Courts have determined that only the following agencies are permitted access to your social security account number:
1. The Department of Social Services, assistance. (D.S.H.S. for public assistance.) 2. The IRS (For tax purposes). Limited to voluntary use only by the people.
The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is a private collection agency for the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)
No comments:
Post a Comment