Tuesday, August 30, 2011

BLACKS ARE THE ONLY RACE GOV'T HAS TO VOTE ON TO VOTE!! (DO YOU OVERSTAND WHAT I JUST SAID!)

It’s 2006, and hedz still think our government isn’t racist! On Thursday, July 13, 2006, the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which opened
booths to millionz of Afrikanz-in-america (Black people), was “granted” a 25-year extension from Congress as Republicanz sought
to improve their standing with us so-called “minoriteez” before electionz this fall.
The Senate turned in a 98-0 vote count the week of July 17th after the previous week’s House passage vote count of 390-33. Can
you believe there were actually 33 votes that wanted to abolish Afrikanz-in-America's right to vote?!
The next step is for good-old George W to sign the legislation, which, by the way, was not a coincidence that he finally showz up to
speak at the National Association for the Advancement of CERTAIN People’s (NAACP) national conference after refusing to the
invitation for five yearz in a row.
President Lyndon Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law in August 1965 after efforts to fully integrate Afrikanz produced
violent reactionz in Southern states. The law declared a nationwide prohibition against voting discrimination based on race,
eliminated poll taxes and literacy tests, and other election devices that were used for decades to keep us from voting.
The 33 who voted against the Act were obviously Republican. They wanted to shorten the renewal from 25 yearz to 10!! But that
don’t make the Democrats our ally either!
We should all be askin’ ourselves, “25 yearz?! Why not LIFE!” This is why I am a proud NON-registered voter! That’s right, I don’t
vote, ‘cause it’s a game designed for you to believe you have a say when you actually don’t!
I mean, ask yourselves, why are Afrikanz-in-america the only group of people who has to ask if we can partake in voting every 25
yearz?!!? It’s asinine for our “so-called” leaderz to allow this shit to happen! Why aren’t they informing the people of this fact?! Oh,
forgot, they’re all part of the game – they’re not our leaderz, the system appointed them as our leaderz for us!
This Act and every election should be seen as an insult to us – especially for those who call themselves “american” because the
truth is we’re “leased” americanz!
The fact the government makes this a part of legislation serves as an even greater diss because it meanz come 2031, hedz will
convene again and decide if Afrikanz should be “granted” the permission to partake in voting again!! I mean, what’s the big deal
with trashin’ the 25-year contract and make it life?! It’s clear to me they still see us as 2nd class and thus not worthy of full
citizenship.
No other race, including Asian- and Latino-americanz have to have congress pass a bill allowing them the right to vote here in
america.
We are the only hedz who have to go through this despite the large percentage of us that make up this country’s armed forces as
well as having the largest spending power – well over $761 billion ($1 trillion by 2010)!
Ask yourself, what you think woulda happened had they not passed the Act? Take a sec and marinate on that vision… I think all
hell woulda broke loose, Sun! In fact, it actually woulda finally freed us because we would finally wise-up! We’d finally see how
they truly see us; we’d ultimately give the ax to the co-conspiratorz of our ignorance – our so-called negro leaderz – and develop
new leadership, creating our own systematic government!

I guess YT ain’t fully ready fi war yet! But that don’t mean we shouldn’t be gettin’ prepared. It shoudn’t take another 25 yearz to go
by ‘til we speak on this again, ‘cause come 2031, they might be ready to deal with the repercussionz of abolishing the Act.
So instead of celebrating YTs permission to play in his reindeer games for the next 25 seasonz, we should be organizing our own
game plan which would include a Nationality that would give us both dual citizenship and exemption from the 2nd class rights
they instilled on us post-1865. There needz to be more than speeches, marches, protests, and boycotts, there needz to be a
strategic 5-10 year plan devised or revised to develop our own government – a system that unites all melanated Afrikanz ‘pon di
world!
Ok, enough of the readin’, “Go out and get this movement started!!”  M'BWEBE AJA ASHANGHI

Sunday, August 28, 2011

INTRODUCING PLANET DA MAJUSTIC (THAT'Z MY BROTHER) BRINGIN' THAT TRUE HIP HOP (NO OVER COMPRESSED 808s HERE!), ITS A MUST LISTEN!!

GO GET SPEEKER NOIZE NOW, THEN THAT WILL PREARE YOU FOR HEAVY HANDS!

Sunday, August 21, 2011

THE OBAMA DECEPTION PT. 1

 

LOOK AT THIS, LETS MAKE SURE WE ARE PUTTING THE RIGHT PEOPLE IN OFFICE REGARDLES OF COLOR, CREED, ORIGIN, RACE! REASEARCH BEFORE YOU PICK ANYONE IN OFFICE AGAIN PEOPLE OVER CORPORATE, PEOPLE OVER POLITICAL AGENDAS!

U.S. INC. VS US 

FALL OF THE REPUBLIC PT. 2

 

ITS NOT THE COLOR OF THE MAN, ITS THE MOVEMENTS OF THE MAN!!
REMEMBER PEOPLE OVER CORPORATE, PEOPLE OVER POLITICAL AGENDAS!! 

U.S. INC. VS US 

Saturday, August 20, 2011

SIGNS OF SATAN!

 

ALOT OF YOU WAVE THIS SIGN FREELY NOT KNOWING ITS TRUE ORIGIN AND MEANING, WELL HERE IT IS NOW STOP THROWING  THAT FALSE ROCK & ROLL SIGN UP SHEEPLE!!!!!!!!

Friday, August 19, 2011

ATTACKONCHRISTIANS! IS A MUST, MUST VISIT!!!!

ALL I HAVE TO SAY IZ IF YOU DON'T VISIT THIS SITE YOU WILL BE MISSING A GREAT DEAL OF KNOWLEDGE, HE KNOWS WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT! www.attackonchristians.blogspot.com

USE OF 11 IN HIS-STORY! SOURCE (CRAIG BLACKMOORE, YOUR A DEMIGOD FOR THIS ONE!)

Startling Review Of Use Of “11″ In History
Common Themes: War, Violence, Struggle.
The below information is copied and edited from the Cutting Edge.org.
When the Illuminati ended the First World War, they had just successfully completed the first war of the occult plan to produce the Antichrist. Thus, they deliberately ended World War One on the 11th Month [November], the 11th Day, at the 11th hour. The signing of the Armistice agreement was thus undergirded by three elevens!
When the Illuminati assassinated President Kennedy, he was killed according to the occult number signature of eleven [11]. He was killed in the 11th month, on the 22nd day, and on the 33rd parallel. He was also killed in the Masonic Dealey Plaza.

September 11, 1609 — The explorer Henry Hudson sailed into New York harbor and discovered Manhattan Island and the Hudson River, the very location on which the Twin Towers were constructed!

September 11, 1941 — Construction officially began at the Pentagon. [Ibid.] Thus, 60 years later to the day, the Pentagon is attacked. The number “6″ is an important number to the occultist. The number of man is “6″; the number of man’s “perfect” government is “66″ and the number of the perfect leader of all time is “666″.

September 11, 1972 — The world was introduced to terrorism at the 1972 Munich Olympic Games. . There were 121 participating countries (11X11=121), and 11 Israeli athletes were killed. Exactly 29 years (2+9=11) after this terrorist horror ended, another more despicable horror occurred – the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

September 11, 1772 — About 300 Indians and 50 British soldiers began the siege of Fort Henry. Researchers and historians of this siege are puzzled by the meaning of a comment in a document describing these events. It was recorded in a letter written by Lydia Cruger (11 letters), and it seems a fitting comment to this section. She wrote, “The siege commenced about sun an hour high, Monday, 11th, at all events, the 11th.” [Ibid.]

September 11, 1776 — A failed peace conference with the British was held. The war that had begun on April 19, 1776 [the first day of the 13-day Satanic celebration, "The Bloody Sacrifice of the Beast"] continued. [Ibid.] After the fall of New York to the British, a Peace Conference was held between General Howe and three prominent representatives of the Continental Congress – Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Edward Rutledge. After taking the Americans key city, Howe thought he was entitled to a peace settlement. The Americans, having declared independence in July, considered separation from England as non-negotiable. The conference of Sept. 11, 1776, ended and the war continued for seven years.

September 11, 1777 — The first day the American flag was used in battle at the Battle of Brandywine. [Ibid.] The British defeated the Americans, led by George Washington, but Old Glory flew for the first time!

September 11, 1922 — Despite Arab protests, a British mandate is proclaimed in Palestine on September 11, 1922. The mandate came into effect at the end of September 1922. [Ibid.] Not only was this proclamation made on a September 11, but the year formed a twice “11″ — (11×2)

September 11, 1941 — The US 1st Army crosses the border into German territory. Also, the Quebec Conference was held between England’s Prime Minister, Winston Churchill. [Ibid.]

September 11, 1973 — Chilean President Salvador Allende is killed in a brutal, violent military coup led by General Augusto Pinochet. [Ibid.] Henry Kissinger was strongly implicated in this attack, and if he were to ever stand trial in an International Court, he would be charged with masterminding this coup and ordering the assassination of Allende. [" The Latest Kissinger Outrage: Why is a proven liar and wanted man in charge of the 9/11 investigation?", by Christopher Hitchens, November 27, 2002]

Thursday, August 18, 2011

MARRIAGE LICENSES: THE REAL TRUTH

Marriage Licenses....The Real Truth

Did you know what you got into when you got a marriage license from the
state? You were "tricked" into signing over your children to the state!
(The fruit of a marriage!)


====================================
Marriage Licenses:

The Real Truth

by Virgil Cooper
ultrac21@whitemtns.com

Enlightening Conversation with a Marriage License Bureau. . . .

About 15 years ago, my former wife of 26 years, filed for divorce. We had seven (7) children: five (5) daughters and two (2) sons. Our youngest at the time, our second son, was five years old. At the time, I prepared a counterclaim to the Petition for Dissolution her attorney filed in Domestic Relations (DR) court.

I met one afternoon with the head of the Maricopa County Superior Court, Marriage License Bureau, in downtown Phoenix. The marriage license bureau was headed by a young woman of about age 25. I asked her to explain to me the general and statutory implications of the marriage license. She was very cooperative, and called in an Assistant, a tall Black man who at the time was working on an Operations Manual for internal departmental use.

She deferred for most technical explanations to her Assistant. He walked through the technicalities of the marriage license as it operates in Arizona. He mentioned that marriage licensing is pretty much the same in the other states --but there are differences. One significant difference he mentioned was that Arizona is one of eight western states that are Community Property states. The other states are Common Law states, including Utah, with the exception of Louisiana which is a Napoleonic Code state.

He then explained some of the technicalities of the marriage license. He said, first of all, the marriage license is Secular Contract between the parties and the State. The State is the principal party in that Secular Contract. The husband and wife are secondary or inferior parties. The Secular Contract is a three-way contract between the State, as Principal, and the husband and wife as the other two legs of the Contract.

He said, in the traditional sense a marriage is a covenant between the husband and wife and God. But in the Secular Contract with the state, reference to God is a dotted line, and NOT officially considered included in the Secular Contract at all.

He said, if the husband and wife wish to include God as a party in their marriage, that is a "dotted line" they will have to add in their own minds. The state's marriage license is "strictly secular," he said. He said further, that what he meant by the relationship to God being a "dotted line" meant that the State regards any mention of God as irrelevant, even meaningless.

In his description of the marriage license contract, the related one other "dotted line." He said in the traditional religious context, marriage was a covenant between the husband and wife and God with husband and wife joined as one. This is not the case in the secular realm of the state's marriage license contract. The State is the Principal or dominant party. The husband and wife are merely contractually "joined" as business partners, not in any
religious union. They may even be considered, he said, connected to each other by another "dotted line."

 The picture he was trying to "paint" was that of a triangle with the State at the top and a solid line extending from the apex, the State, down the left side to the husband, and a separate solid line extending down the right side to the wife, a "dotted line" merely showing that they consider themselves to have entered into a religious union of some sort that is irrelevant to the State.

He further mentioned that this "religious overtone" is recognized by the State by requiring that the marriage must be solemnized either by a state official or by a minister of religion that has been "deputized" by the State to perform the marriage ceremony and make a return of the signed and executed marriage license to the State.

Again, he emphasized that marriage is a strictly secular relationship so far as the State is concerned and because it is looked upon as a "privileged business enterprise" various tax advantages and other political privileges have become attached to the marriage license contract that have nothing at all to do with marriage as a religious
covenant or bond between God and a man and a woman.

By way of reference, if you would like to read a legal treatise on marriage, one of the best is "Principles of Community Property," by William Defuniak. At the outset, he explains that Community Property law descends from Roman Civil Law through the Spanish Codes, 600 A.D., written by the Spanish juris consults.

In the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a for-profit venture or profit-making venture (even though it may never actually produce a profit in operation) and as the wife goes out to the local market to purchase food stuffs and other supplies for the marriage household, she is replenishing the stocks of the business. To restate: In the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a business venture, that is, a for-profit business venture. Moreover, as children come into the marriage household, the business venture is considered to have "borne fruit."

Now, back to the explanation by the Maricopa County Superior Court, Marriage Bureau's administrative Assistant. He went on to explain that every contract must have consideration. The State offers consideration in the form of the actual license itself - the piece of paper, the Certificate of Marriage. The other part of consideration by the State is "the privilege to be regulated by statute." He added that this privilege to be regulated by statute includes all related statutes, and all court cases as they are ruled on by the courts, and all statutes and regulations into the future in the years following the commencement of the marriage. He said in a way the marriage license contract is a dynamic or flexible, ever-changing contract as time goes along - even though the husband and wife didn't realize that.

My thought on this is can it really be considered a true contract as one becomes aware of the failure by the State to make full disclosure of the terms and conditions. A contract must be entered into knowingly, intelligently, intentionally, and with fully informed consent. Otherwise, technically there is no contract.

Another way to look as the marriage license contract with the State is as a contract of adhesion, a contract between two disparate, unequal parties. Again, a flawed "contract." Such a contract with the State is said to be a "specific performance" contract as to the privileges, duties and responsibilities that attach.

Consideration on the part of the husband and wife is the actual fee paid and the implied agreement to be subject to the state's statutes, rules, and regulations and all court cases ruled on related to marriage law, family law, children, and property. He emphasized that this contractual consideration by the bride and groom places them in a definite and defined-by-law position inferior and subject to the State. He commented that very few people realize this.

He also said that it is very important to understand that children born to the marriage are considered by law as "the contract bearing fruit" -meaning the children primarily belong to the State, even though the law never comes out and says so in so many words.

In this regard, children born to the contract regarded as "the contract bearing fruit," he said it is vitally important for
parents to understand two doctrines that became established in the United States during the 1930s. The first is the Doctrine of Parens Patriae. The second is the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis.

Parens Patriae means literally "the parent of the country" or to state it more bluntly - the State is the undisclosed true parent. Along this line, a 1930s Arizona Supreme Court case states that parents have no property right in their children, and have custody of their children during good behavior at the sufferance of the State. This means that parents may raise their children and maintain custody of their children as long as they don't offend the State, but if they in some manner displease the State, the State can step in at any time and exercise its superior status and take custody and control of its children - the parents are only conditional caretakers. [Thus the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis.]

He also added a few more technical details. The marriage license is an ongoing contractual relationship with the State. Technically, the marriage license is a business license allowing the husband and wife, in the name of the marriage, to enter into contracts with third parties and contract mortgages and debts. They can get car loans,
home mortgages, and installment debts in the name of the marriage because it is not only a secular enterprise, but it is looked upon by the State as a privileged business enterprise as well as a for-profit business enterprise. The marriage contract acquires property through out its existence and over time, it is hoped, increases in value.

Also, the marriage contract "bears fruit" by adding children. If sometime later, the marriage fails, and a "divorce" results the contract continues in existence. The "divorce" is merely a contractual dissolution or amendment of the terms and conditions of the contract. Jurisdiction of the State over the marriage, over the husband and wife, now separated, continues and continues over all aspects of the marriage, over marital property and over children brought into the marriage.

That is why family law and the Domestic Relations court calls "divorce" a dissolution of the marriage because the contract continues in operation but in amended or modified form. He also pointed out that the marriage license contract is one of the strongest, most binding contractual relationships the State has on people.

At the end of our hour-long meeting, I somewhat humorously asked if other people had come in and asked the questions I was asking? The Assistant replied that in the several years he had worked there, he was not aware of anyone else asking these questions. He added that he was very glad to see someone interested in the legal implications of the marriage license and the contractual relationship it creates with the State.

His boss, the young woman Marriage Bureau department head stated, "You have to understand that people who come in here to get a marriage license are in heat. The last thing they want to know is technical, legal and statutory implications of the marriage license."

I hope this is helpful information to anyone interested in getting more familiar with the contractual implications of the
marriage license. The marriage license as we know it didn't come into existence until after the Civil War and didn't become standard practice in all the states until after 1900, becoming firmly established by 1920. In effect, the states or governments appropriated or usurped control of marriages in secular form and in the process declared Common Law applicable to marriages "abrogated."

Please pass this information along and share it as widely as possible.

Original message from Virgil Cooper: ultrac21@whitemtns.com

“Essentially, the husband and wife became married to the STATE; anything the two produced became the property and control of the STATE.”- - Jack Slevkoff


Such contacts can be considered void due to non-full disclosure
or can be terminated when full disclosure is realized.


"The state is a party to every marriage contract of its own residents
as well as the guardians of their morals."
--Roberts v. Roberts (19947) 81 CA2d 871, 185 P2d 381

Sunday, August 14, 2011

DJ MUGGS vs ILL BILL - "Cult Assassin" Pt. 1 of 4 Please Watch These Videos This is what Hip Hop is supposed to be about informing the masses on whats going on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PAY ATTENTION TO THE LYRICS, PAY ATTENTION TO THE LYRICS!!


DJ MUGGS vs ILL BILL - "Kill Devil Hills" ft. B-Real & Vinnie Paz Pt. 2 of 4


DJ MUGGS vs ILL BILL - "ILLUMINATI 666" Pt. 3 of 4


DJ MUGGS vs ILL BILL - "Millenniums of Murder" Pt. 4 of 4


DOCUMENTARIES YOU MUST HAVE, LEAVE THEM DUMBED DOWN BIASED PROGRAMMED MOVIES ALONE!!!!!!

THE CORPORATION
AMERICA - FREEDOM TO FASCISM
RUN FROM THE CURE
THE CALLING/THE AWAKENING
POLICE STATE
DON'T TALK TO POLICE
EXPOSED DVD SERIES
THE OBAMA DECEPTION
FALL OF THE REPUBLIC
MONEY AS DEBT I-II
ESOTERICA AGENDA
KYMATICA
LOOSE CHANGE 9/11

JUST TO NAME A FEW!  KNOWLEDGE TRUMPZ THUGGIN' ANY DAY! WE MUST BREAK THE SPELL OF LEVIATHAN THE KINGU SLEEP!

IMMORTAL TECHNIQUE - CAUSE OF DEATH TRUTH IN HIP HOP!


DIABOLIC TRUTH PT. 2 NUFF SAID!!


Saturday, August 13, 2011

TRUTH TRUMPZ THUGGIN' ANY DAY CHOOSE YOUR WEAPONTRY I CHOOSE LCOB!!


INTERNAL REVENUE CODE TITLE 26 (A) THE PART THATS TAKEN OUT OF COMPANIES REGULATION!

TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 64 > Subchapter D > PART II > § 6331
Prev | Next
§ 6331. Levy and distraint

(a) Authority of Secretary

If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.



THIS MEANS THAT ONLY GOV'T, STATE & DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EMPLOYEES CAN BE LEVIED NOT YOU AND I, THOSE WHO WORK OUTSIDE OF GOV'T! 

THEY SAY THIS PART IS CONFUSING, FUNNY THEY WOULD SAY THAT WHEN IT DOESN'T BENEFIT THEM. 

REF: CORNELL UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL 

Friday, August 12, 2011

YOU DON'T NEED A MARRIAGE LISCENSE!

MYTH - YOU NEED A MARRIAGE LICENSE


“Marriage license. A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry …”
Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 973

Did you get that? If you wish to marry a person of another race, you need a state issued marriage license. Otherwise, under law, you do not.

MYTH BUSTED!

The marriage license is a state TRAP! When you marry anyone with a state issued marriage license, the state becomes a third party to the marriage and, since the state issued the license, gave permission for the marriage, it has the highest interest in, and control over, the marriage and any offspring. When you get a marriage license from the state, you become slaves to Old Master who gave you permission to marry. On the old plantation, when two slaves were given permission to marry, whose children were the offspring? They did not belong to the slaves, they were the property of Old Master and it is that way today. That is why Social Services can take ‘your’ children away from you if they even think , or someone reports, that you are not treating them in a proper manner. They are not your children, they belong to Old Master. You do not need a marriage license to get married. It is your God given right to marry. The state cannot take away your God-given rights but you can voluntarily give them up by applying for and obtaining a state marriage license, driver’s license, business license or any other state issued license. With a state marriage license you cannot be joined in Holy Matrimony you can only be ‘married’ in a church. Do you suppose that has anything to do with the alarming divorce rate in America today? However, the state is looking for CONTROL. So, in the case of marriage, they very cleverly set things up so that most churches cannot marry a couple without a state marriage license. How did they do that? All Churches and ministries are exempt from taxation and money given to them is deductible from income taxes, if one is ignorant enough or timid enough to still be paying such extortion to the IRS. See MYTH SIX. The IRS even acknowledges that fact in Section 508(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code which says that churches and ministries are mandatorially exempt.

After receiving the information of live birth and other particulars for the birth certificate accompanied by the assigned social security number, the state claims an interest in every child within its jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee, foster parent) over what you thought were your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset that, if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. It is presumed by those who have researched this issue, that the child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering registration of the trust, allowing for the trust’s assets to be tracked so our children are owned by the state. Each one of us, including our children, is considered an asset of the bankrupt United States (corporation). We are now designated by this government as “human resources,” born in a delivery room, delivered to the state of birth by way of the birth certificate for which our informer (our Mother) provides the requested information including the name and social security (or tracking) number wherewith this bankrupt government is supplied with a new crop of collateral born each year. After being born free men and women, our parents inadvertently turn us over to the State by recording a birth certificate with the county in which we were born. We are then ‘chattel’ and our lifetime production is to be used against the bankruptcy of the incorporated municipal UNITED STATES. The certificate is sent to the Department of Commerce, where the government keeps track of its property, and is credited to the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank which is not federal, has no reserves and is not a bank but is privately owned by 12 unimaginably wealthy families. 

 Your birth certificate is valued at $1 million, which is what the government has
decided, on average, each individual will ‘produce’ during their lifetime and is used by the government as collateral to borrow money for various purposes. The birth certificate, in effect, says to the government “Oh Master, sir, here’s another slave for you to work on your plantation”. The parents, being slaves themselves, do not own the children, the government (Old Master) owns them for it was he who gave the parents permission to marry (marriage license) and, if the parents do not take care of his children and treat them properly, the state Social Services will take them away and place them elsewhere wherever they wish - - foster homes, etc..

MYTH BUSTED! 

There is no law which says a birth certificate must be made out at all. The birth of a child was traditionally recorded in the family Bible and that was that. If that is done, and many are doing so as this knowledge spreads, there is no obligation for the person to perform for the government in any way. One can make out a Certificate of Birth for the newborn, can even use the state’s form, just do not file it with the county if you wish your children to remain free men and women.

 

MYTH - YOU MUST HAVE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE



“Like it or not, you are a slave.”
-- Dr. Alan Keyes, candidate for the Republican nomination for U.S. President

Are We Owned By the Government?

In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth “registration” or what we now know as the “Birth Certificate”. It was known as the “Maternity Act” and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and to accomplish “other purposes”.
One of those other purposes provided for state agencies in overseeing of its operations and expenditures. What it really did was create a federal “birth registry” which exists today, creating “federal children”. This government of “Parens Patriae,” now legislates for American children as if they are owned by the federal or state government. Through the public school enrollment process and continuing license requirements for most aspects of daily life, these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated into those things necessary to carry out activities that exist in what is called a “free country”.
Before 1921, the records of births and names of children were entered into the family Bibles, as were the records of marriages, deaths and other family events. Both the family and the law readily accepted these records as “official records.” Since 1921, the American people have been registering the births and names of their children with the government of the county and state in which they are born, even though there is no law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child’s birth through the birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the United States, thereby making him/her a United States Citizen. For the past several years a social security number was mandated to be issued at birth by the federal government. The social security number is one of those “other purposes.” It serves as a means of lifelong tracking of the one whose name is on the birth certificate.
On April 9, 1933, the UNITED STATES (Corporate Government) was declared bankrupt by President Roosevelt. Visit www.freedomdomain.com/bankrupt.html for the full details. The governors of the then 48 States pledged the “full faith and credit” of each of their States, including the citizenry as collateral, for loans of credit from the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank system.
To wit: “FULL FAITH AND CREDIT,” the clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article IV, Section I) which provides the various states must recognize legislative acts, public records, and judicial decisions of the other states within the united States. It requires that foreign judgment be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of its origin and that foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in the home state. And that judgment of record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken. Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth and Sixth Editions

After receiving the information of live birth and other particulars for the birth certificate accompanied by the assigned social security number, the state claims an interest in every child within its jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee, foster parent) over what you thought were your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset that, if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. It is presumed by those who have researched this issue, that the child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering registration of the trust, allowing for the trust’s assets to be tracked so our children are owned by the state. Each one of us, including our children, is considered an asset of the bankrupt United States (corporation). We are now designated by this government as “human resources,” born in a delivery room, delivered to the state of birth by way of the birth certificate for which our informer (our Mother) provides the requested information including the name and social security (or tracking) number wherewith this bankrupt government is supplied with a new crop of collateral born each year. After being born free men and women, our parents inadvertently turn us over to the State by recording a birth certificate with the county in which we were born. We are then ‘chattel’ and our lifetime production is to be used against the bankruptcy of the incorporated municipal UNITED STATES. The certificate is sent to the Department of Commerce, where the government keeps track of its property, and is credited to the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank which is not federal, has no reserves and is not a bank but is privately owned by 12 unimaginably wealthy families.
Visit www.elimadebts.com for full sad story of the Federal Reserve Bank. Your birth certificate is valued at $1 million, which is what the government has
decided, on average, each individual will ‘produce’ during their lifetime and is used by the government as collateral to borrow money for various purposes. The birth certificate, in effect, says to the government “Oh Master, sir, here’s another slave for you to work on your plantation”. The parents, being slaves themselves, do not own the children, the government (Old Master) owns them for it was he who gave the parents permission to marry (marriage license) and, if the parents do not take care of his children and treat them properly, the state Social Services will take them away and place them elsewhere wherever they wish - - foster homes, etc..
MYTH BUSTED!

There is no law which says a birth certificate must be made out at all. The birth of a child was traditionally recorded in the family Bible and that was that. If that is done, and many are doing so as this knowledge spreads, there is no obligation for the person to perform for the government in any way. One can make out a Certificate of Birth for the newborn, can even use the state’s form, just do not file it with the county if you wish your children to remain free men and women.

 

UCC 1-207 (NOW UCC-1-308) EXPLAINED!

If you are confronted with explaining what the "UCC 1-207/1-308" does here is
your answer.

When you are going to sign a contract ( drivers license, lease, buying a
automobile, snowmobile, a building permit, marriage license, divorce decree,
or any other document).

BEFORE you sign!!! you have the right to draw a fine line through any
thing that is not to your liking. It can be a number, a letter, a word or a
group of words. At this time you can add any thing you want in the contract.
Any changes you have made sign your name close to it and date it. A contract
is to have all of the contract in full disclosure at the time of signing. If
not the UCC 1-207 will stop you from giving up your rights on the contract
you are about to sign and void out any part of the contract that you have
not had the opportunity to view.

Now how the UCC 1-207 works.

After you put UCC 1-207 where your signature is going to be. " your
signature" is the last you thing you put on the document. When you pick up
your pen from the signed contract it is consummated, you have given up your
right to change the contract.

UCC 207-1: Fact or Fiction???<<<<

It CAN be used to reserve rights to get out of a contract AT THE TIME OF SIGNING of such contract should invisible aspects of said contract become apparent at a later date or letters of a contract were not advised when you entered the contract.

Can it be used to reserve rights at the time of signing a drivers license? YES, but the State will do everything in their power to stop you from signing the license this way. Besides, when you get in front of the judge he will ask you what it means and you damn well better know or you are toast.

Any contract that is entered into by one party because of a deception of part of the other party, the contract is illegitamate. This would include but not be limited to licensing , titles on property or property tax.

Thursday, August 11, 2011

WE ARE SO CAUGHT UP IN OUR VANITIES, WE DON'T REALIZE LOVING ONESELF IS THE TRUE BEAUTY, WHAT YOU TRIPPIN' FOR HE'S NOT, CHECK IT OUT!!!!!!!!


CHILDREN OF TOMORROW, I APOLOGIZE SINCERELY CHILDREN!

Children Of Tomorrow

Children of tomorrow
I apologize to you
On behalf of those in my time
For the things we didn't do
We didn't stop the tyrants
So your fate could be prevented
We watched them steal our freedom
By our silence we consented
We didn't choose to circumvent
The doom you've not escaped
While the Bill of Rights was murdered
And the Constitution raped
Some of us were lazy
Others too afraid
To think about our children
The ones we have betrayed
I guess we were too busy
To be concerned or care
To try to ease the burden
Of the chains we made you wear
We could have been good shepherds
When the wolf got in the fold
But we watched the flame of freedom die instead
And left you cold

I'm sorry we were timid
My selfish generation
We left you but a remnant
Of a free and prosperous nation
I'm sorry for our actions
Like cowards we behaved
We could have left you freedom
Instead you are enslaved
Children of tomorrow
Descendants of our land
I'm sorry we allowed this
The fate you now with stand

- Anonymous

MOST OF US ADULTS CAN LEARN FROM HER, SALUTE!!!!


GERONIMO PRATT PASSES AWAY

Geronimo Ji-Jaga Pratt Dies in Tanzania



Geronimo Ji Jaga (September 13, 1947 – June 2, 2011), also known as Geronimo Pratt, was a high ranking member of the Black Panther Party. The Federal Bureau of Investigation targeted him in a COINTELPRO operation, which aimed to “neutralize Pratt as an effective BPP functionary.” Pratt was falsely accused, tried and convicted of the kidnap and murder of Caroline Olsen in 1972, and spent 27 years in prison, eight of which were in solitary confinement. Pratt was freed in 1997 when his conviction was vacated. He was working as a human rights activist up until the time of his death. Pratt was also the godfather of the late rapper Tupac Shakur. He died of a heart attack in his adopted country, Tanzania, on June 2, 2011.

Early years

Geronimo Ji Jaga was born in Morgan City, Louisiana and was a high school quarterback. His father was in the scrap metal business. He served two combat tours in the Vietnam War, reaching the rank of sergeant and earning two Bronze Stars, a Silver Star, and two Purple Hearts. He later moved to Los Angeles.

After he served his two tours, Geronimo Ji Jaga studied political science at UCLA, using the GI Bill. Geronimo Ji Jaga was recruited into the Panthers by Bunchy Carter and John Huggins. When Pratt joined the Black Panthers, his years in the army proved useful. He rose to be Minister of Defense of the local organization, after two of its officers were killed. In 1971, Geronimo Ji Jaga’s wife Saundra was killed while 8 months pregnant and left in a ditch. The murder was blamed on a Party schism between supporters of Huey Newton and those of Eldridge Cleaver, with Geronimo Ji Jaga and his wife belonging to the Cleaver faction. Geronimo later understood this to be an F.B.I. lie. Saundra’s murder was unrelated to the Black Panther Party.

By January 1970, the Los Angeles FBI office had sought permission from headquarters for a counterintelligence effort “designed to challenge the legitimacy of the authority exercised” by Pratt in the local Panthers. Another FBI memo dated five months later noted that the Bureau was constantly considering counterintelligence measures designed to neutralize Pratt “as an effective (Panther) functionary.”

Murder charges

In 1968, Caroline Olsen, a 27-year-old elementary school teacher, was murdered by gunshot during a robbery on a Santa Monica tennis court. Olsen’s husband, Kenneth, who was also shot but survived, initially identified another man as the killer. Julius Butler, a Black Panther and police informant, fingered Geronimo Pratt as the killer. In 1970, Geronimo Ji Jaga was arrested and charged with murder and kidnapping.

His attorney, Johnnie L. Cochran Jr., assured his client that the charges would be dropped, given that Geronimo Ji Jaga had been 350 miles away on the night of the murder and could prove it. But, according to and alleged by journalist and author Jack Olsen, they were met with setbacks, from lying prosecution witnesses trooped to exculpatory evidence disappearing at police stations and the L.A. District Attorney’s office. According to Olsen, it was later revealed that FBI “moles” had infiltrated defense sessions and monitored Cochran’s phone calls.

Prison

Geronimo Ji Jaga always maintained his innocence. During his incarceration he studied law and steadfastly built a defense. Geronimo Ji Jaga was represented by attorneys Stuart Hanlon and Johnnie Cochran in his original trial. Together with William Paparian, Hanlon contributed much to the appeals that later led to Pratt’s conviction being vacated.

Murder conviction vacated

Geronimo Ji Jaga’s conviction was vacated on June 10, 1997, on the grounds that the prosecution had concealed evidence that might have exonerated the defendant. In particular, the government had not disclosed that a key witness against Pratt, Julius Butler, was an informant for both the FBI and the Los Angeles Police Department. An appeals court ruled this fact to be “‘favorable’ to the defendant, ‘suppressed’ by a law enforcement agency, and ‘material’ to the jury’s decision to convict.”

Geronimo Ji Jaga eventually received $4.5 million as settlement for false imprisonment. A federal judge approved the settlement of the civil suit: The city of L.A. paid $2.75 million of the settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice paying the $1.75 million remainder.

Later years

Geronimo Ji Jaga continued to work on behalf of men and women believed to be wrongfully incarcerated until his death, including participation in rallies in support of Mumia Abu-Jamal, whom he had met when both were active as Black Panthers.
Geronimo Ji Jaga was living in Tanzania at the time of his death.

ENGLAND'S SMARTEST FAMILY IS BLACK!! AND YOU THOUGHT DIFFERENT!

ENGLAND'S SMARTEST FAMILY





Meet the First Family of Education in England. They are Black.

Peter and Paula Imafidon, nine-year-old twins from Waltham Forest in northeast London, are a part of the highest-achieving clan in the history of Great Britain education. The two youngest siblings are about to make British history as the youngest students to ever enter high school. They astounded veteran experts of academia when they became the youngest to ever pass the University of Cambridge’s advanced mathematics exam. That’s on top of the fact they have set world records when they passed the A/AS-level math papers.

Chris Imafidon, their father, said he’s not concerned about his youngest children’s ability to adapt to secondary school despite their tender age. “We’re delighted with the progress they have made,” he said. “Because they are twins they are always able to help and support each other.”To Peter and Paula’s parents, this is nothing new. Chris Imafidon said he and his wife have been through this before: They have other super-gifted, overachieving children.

Peter and Paula’s sister, Anne-Marie, now 20, holds the world record as the youngest girl to pass the A-level computing when she was just 13. She is now studying at arguably the most renowned medical school in the United States, Johns Hopkins University, in Baltimore. Another sister, Christina, 17, is the youngest student to ever get accepted and study at an undergraduate institution at any British university at 11. And Samantha, now age 12, had passed two rigorous high school-level mathematics and statistics exams at the age of six, something that her twin siblings, Peter and Paula, also did.

Chris Imafidon migrated to London from Nigeria in West Africa over 30 years ago. And despite his children’s jaw-dropping, history-making academic achievements, he denies there is some “genius gene” in his family. Instead, he credits his children’s success to the Excellence in Education program for disadvantaged inner-city children.

“Every child is a genius,” he told British reporters. “Once you identify the talent of a child and put them in the environment that will nurture that talent, then the sky is the limit. Look at Tiger Woods or the Williams sisters [Venus and Serena] — they were nurtured. You can never rule anything out with them. The competition between the two of them makes them excel in anything they do.”

–Terry Shropshire, www.rollingout.com

Brainwash: Challenging The Myth of Black Inferiority, Get This Book!!!!!!!

http://www.stopthebrainwash.com/

BRAINWASHED - by Tom Burrell




Ad executive Tom Burrell has seen first-hand how images can influence consumer thoughts and behaviors. He founded Burrell Communications Group in 1971 and has worked to promote positive and realistic images of African-Americans ever since. His new book, Brainwashed: Challenging the Myth of Black Inferiority, examines how negative images and stereotypes have impacted America's view of African-Americans. "If you give people negative images...then they're going to internalize those images," Burrell said."By portraying it constantly on the screen and on the tube, you take the reality of one and you make it a reality for millions."



Burrell says he cringes when he watches daytime court tv shows or movies like Precious and The Blind Side, because he says the portrayals of African-Americans are troubling. "Look at Precious, the casting...all of the misfits, all of the pathological characters are dark-skinned," Burrell said. "All of the good people, the saviors are at least half-white. If it is not intentional, it is certainly insensitive." In Burrell's book, he outlines how blacks have devalued their own self-worth and how that has negatively impacted their education, health and spending habits.



Burrell says slavery is the historical root of many problems but not the only cause. "Today, African-Americans have become accomplices to this 'brainwashing' of inferiority," said Burrell who describes the work of filmmaker Tyler Perry as "egregious." "When a respected, talented black person puts [negative images] out, they automatically gain more acceptability."

Taken from - THE GRIO By Todd Johnson 02/12/2010

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

THE M.O. KEEP US CONFUSED I THINK NOT, GRIFF SPEAK TO THEM!!!!


PROFESSOR GRIFF SPITTIN' THE REAL TRUTH!!!!! LISTEN


YOUR NAME IN CAPITAL LETTERS, YOUR STRAW MAN EXPLAINED!!!!!!!

Exactly who are you? Very few of us have any idea who we really are. We have been taught since birth to go along with a great many laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc. that really have nothing to do with us but only apply to who we think and presume that we are. They are really only MYTHS!

YOUR “STRAW MAN” EXPLAINED

Look in your wallet or purse and you will notice that the name on all your credit cards, insurance cards, club cards,social security card, driver’s license if you have one, etc. is in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. That is not you! That is known as your STRAW MAN.

WHAT IS THAT ALL ABOUT? In 1938 the United States Supreme Court, in a case called Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, changed our justice system from one of public law to one of public policy and determined that everything is in Commerce. That took away our Constitutional rights replacing them with corporate government rules and regulations. Governments and courts are not real governments and courts; they are corporate fictions. In today’s “courts” we are now guilty until proven innocent because governments, and the courts, presume that we are juristic, corporate persons subject to their laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc. However, unlike entities cannot be joined in Commerce. If you cut corporations, governments, courts or banks, they do not bleed. They are fictions. If you get cut you do bleed. You are real. You are unlike entities and cannot be joined in Commerce. You are real , they are fictions. Soooooo, our government corporations created and offered to us the STRAW MAN as the optional commercial instrument/entity to enable us to move and operate in Commerce and changed us into “corporations” so they could do business with us in Commerce. They invented the STRAW MAN, our name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, a fictitious entity, a corporation! STRAW MAN. A “front”; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts
as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct respecting the property. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser, or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed. 

Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th ed. 

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

THIS IS WHAT WE DID UNKNOWINGLY, ALL THIS IS VOLUNTARY!! OVERSTAND ME!!!

  You were born free and sovereign. That is called your LEGAL STATUS. Then you moved from SOVEREIGN LEGAL STATUS to ALL CONTRACTUAL by entering into a series of contracts. This started with your well-intentioned parents’ inadvertent recording of your birth certificate with the government. Most people are not aware of it but no law requires that! The voluntary and never denied aspects of your STATUS is what clinches the government’s nonexistent claim over your entire life and person, as will be explained as we proceed. Then you signed an application for a Social Security Number (no law requires that). Then you signed an application for a driver’s license (no law requires that). Then you signed an application for voter registration (no law requires that). Then you signed an application for a marriage license (no law requires that unless you wish to intermarry, marry a person of a different race than yourself). Then you signed a license to engage in your business or occupation (no law requires that) Then you signed a 1040 form and filed it with the IRS (no law requires that). Then you signed an application for a permit to build a house, enter into business, collect rents, or whatever else you were asked to do (no law requires any of that). All of the above acts were voluntary on your part and fraudulent on the state’s part. That is because you were not fully informed of their implications, so you can avoid them all if you know the rules of the game!!!
“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.”
Thomas Jefferson Now when I state that “No law requires that” I specifically mean that no law which applies to you requires that. All laws apply to corporate beings but you can rebut the presumption that you are a corporate being.
Because they have created a corporate entity known as our STRAW MAN, e.g. JOHN HENRY DOE, the presumption of government and the courts is that we are juristic, corporate beings and not living breathing souls but that is a rebuttable presumption.  Rebuttable presumption. In the law of evidence, a presumption which may be rebutted by evidence. Otherwise called a “disputable” presumption. A species of legal presumption which holds good until evidence contrary to it is introduced. Black’s Law Dictionary 6th edition, page 1267  

THIS IS A MUST SEE, OVERTSTAND WHAT I'M SAYIN' WATCH THIS, WALK WIT' ME!!!!!!!1


ONE OF THE MOST TERRIFYING VIDEO YOU'LL EVER SEE! PT. 1, PART 2 IS ON YOUTUBUBE AS WELL PLEASE CHECK OUT ALL MY VIDZ!!!!


CODEX ALIMENTARIUS, THE CREATION OF SYNTHETIC NOT NUTRITIOUS FOOD WENT IN TO EFFECT DEC. 2009 THIS IS 1 OF 4 PARTS!!!!


CONGO'S CONFLICT MINERALZ, YOU MIGHT LOOK AT YOUR CELLPHONES DIFFERENT!!


Hip Hop & Freemasonry Pt. 1-11 YES SATAN HAS MANIPULATED OUR MUSIC!! BEWARE OPERATION ZOMBIELAND IS CULMINATING!!!!!! YOU CAN WATCH THE OTHER CHAPTERS ON YOUTUBE!


ERIE RAILROAD CO. V. TOMPKINS, 304 U. S. 64 (1938)

KINGZ AND QUEENZ THIS SUPREME COURT CASE WAS THE BEGINNING OF CONTRACT LAW BEFORE THIS IT WAS COMMON LAW WHICH IS STILL ACTIVE JUST HIDDEN & RIDICULED BY THE POWERS THAT BE PLEASE RESEARCH THIS CASE AND LEARN THE TOOLS THEY DEFEAT US WITH!!

JFK WAS TRULY OUR (LAST TRUE PRESIDENT) ACTUALLY FOR THE PEOPLE!!! LISTEN!


NEW P.E. CHECK IT, THIS IS REAL HIP HOP!!!!!!!!!


TRUTH IZ TRUTH WHETHER ITS KNOWN OR (UNKNOWN)!!!!!!

WE LIVE IN SOCIETY THATS CONTROLLED BY A HIDDEN AGENDA, WHERE THE EXTREMELY WEALTHY FEW CONTROLS THE MASSES.  POWER COMES IN NUMBERS, WE MUST FIRST GAIN THE KNOWLEDGE THATS NOT KNOW TO US AS A WHOLE BE INQUISITIVE ENOUGH TO THIRST FOR IT BE COURAGEOUS ENOUGH TO UTILIZE IT!!!!!!!!!!