Tuesday, August 9, 2011

ERIE RAILROAD CO. V. TOMPKINS, 304 U. S. 64 (1938)

KINGZ AND QUEENZ THIS SUPREME COURT CASE WAS THE BEGINNING OF CONTRACT LAW BEFORE THIS IT WAS COMMON LAW WHICH IS STILL ACTIVE JUST HIDDEN & RIDICULED BY THE POWERS THAT BE PLEASE RESEARCH THIS CASE AND LEARN THE TOOLS THEY DEFEAT US WITH!!

1 comment:

  1. Correct me if im worng, but in a nutshell...."A guy(Tompkins) was walking down the railroad tracks and was legitmately injured by a board. The owner of the tracks(Erie RR co) was liable for his damages. The courts(in thier infinite wisdom...and remember these were the same idiots who said everyone who wasnt white was only 3/5 of a person) said that since Tompkins was not under contract with Erie RR co, they didnt have to pay him anything.

    ReplyDelete